data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
FE has b1-f2 as the 3rd quaver in the 5th group of the line, with the lower note having a natural, which is incomprehensible after b1 in the previous quaver. The notation also influences the pitch of the 1st quaver in the next group, in which c
2 is the lower note, which, in turn, makes the
before the next c
2 superfluous. The anomalies in the notation, together with irregular progression of diminished four-note chords, enable to identify a mistake in this situation. That assumption is proven by the undoubtedly correct version of GE with c2-f
2. In EE1 the version of FE was revised, eliminating the superfluous
before the second b1, while the correct text was reintroduced only in EE2.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE
notation: Pitch