Verbal indications
b. 63-64
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give in bar 63, believing that PE recreated the notation of [A] faithfully. According to us, the engraver's error cannot be totally excluded, while placing a new dynamic indication only in bar 64, as it is in EF, seems to be justified due to the following reasons:
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 64
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The meaning of the indication legatiss., coming from PE (and probably from [A]), is not entirely clear if we take into consideration the slurs which accompany it. According to us, Chopin could have in mind something else than only a linear legatissimo: or even: . category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 64-66
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The indications cresc. in bar 64 and dimin. in bar 66 are only in PE. Similarly in bar 100 and 102. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 66
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
in EF is probably an addition by Fontana, however, it may be considered as an addition to the authentic dynamic concept emerging from the indications of PE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 68-69
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
We give the performance indications of PE, which undoubtedly come from [A]. The sources based on the previous autograph – JC and EF – do not give any indications. category imprint: Differences between sources |