Verbal indications
b. 26-30
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In EF, the 6th quaver in bar 26 is provided with the sign, which does not appear in the remaining sources. In bars 28 and 30, the indication is featured only in FEF and only in the first part of the piece (it is absent in Da Capo written out in notes). We do not include those most probably added by Fontana indications in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 31
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give included in PE. The occurrence of this so characteristic for Chopin indication is one of the arguments for the authenticity of the base text of PE. Similarly in bar 32. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 32
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC there is no performance indication, which suggests that visible in EF is probably an addition by Fontana. For the main text we adopt the indication ben marcato from PE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 32
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The sources related to the previous autograph feature the indication ten. in several places. At the same time, it is hard to determine how the differences between JC and EF were created (see also bar 34); possible changes and additions made by Fontana and errors are concerned. In [A] (→PE), Chopin most probably resigned from those indications, therefore, we do not include them in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 32
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give which is only in PE. category imprint: Differences between sources |