Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 3

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

R.H. in JC

..

The version of JC and EF, with a clearly audible doubled leading note B-b on the 5th quaver of the bar, is undoubtedly earlier. It is difficult to determine how the difference concerning sustaining the note at the transition between bars 3 and 4 was developed. In PE, the lower note of the last semiquaver was printed on the level of c1, which is certainly a mistake corrected by us into d1.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Main-line changes

b. 4

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

..

On the last beat of the bar, EF has crotchets in the parts of both hands. The compatible rhythms of JC (based on [AI]) and PE (based on [A]) give rise to doubts over the authenticity of the version included in EF

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 4

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No indication in JC and EF

in PE

..

There are no reasons to doubt the authenticity of the indication marcato in PE. Most probably it refers to the L.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 4

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No marking in JC and EF

 in PE

..

The diminuendo hairpins, present only in PE, probably refer to the part of the R.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 4

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

..

In JC, there is a cautionary  before the third quaver (A), which is completely unjustified in the context of the version of bar 3 written in that copy.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Cautionary accidentals