|
Tie & slur in JC |
|
|
Slurs in FEF |
|
|
Slurs in GEF |
|
|
Suggested supplement to EF ties |
|
|
Ties in PE, possible interpretation |
|
|
Slurs in PE, probable interpretation |
The meaning and number of slurs starting from the d and d1 crotchets on the 2nd beat of bars 88-89 and 96-97 are unclear. The situation in JC and PE, in which those bars are only a repetition of bars 52-53 and 60-61, is discussed in the note concerning those bars. Consistent ties in bars 88 and 96 in EF may be a result of Fontana's interpretation and revision, which is indicated by lack of a similar consistency in bars 89 and 97, including the difference between FEF and GEF in bar 89. However, assuming that the notation of FEF in bars 88-89 and 96 is correct, we propose to add the missing slurs in bar 97.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Errors in Fontana's editions, Fontana's revisions
notation: Rhythm