data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In JC, the chords in the L.H. are written with g1 instead of f
1.
In the same manuscript, one can see a number of cautionary accidentals, which somehow remind about their validity: a before e
, e
1 and e
4, e
3, a
before a2 and a
before f
3. The flat before e
1 on the 2nd quaver is also in PE.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information
issues: Enharmonic corrections, Last key signature sign
notation: Pitch