a1 as the highest note of the chord is most probably an error of JC; it is revealed by f
1 which is featured both in EF and PE. Analogously, the compatible presence of the c1 note in this chord in JC and PE leads to a conclusion that its omission is probably an error of EF. In the main text we give the version of PE, which does not raise any doubts.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Terzverschreibung error, Uncertain notes on ledger lines, Errors of JC, Errors in Fontana's editions
notation: Pitch