data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
JC
compare
Both JC and EF have the f-a-e1 chord on the 3rd beat of the bar, yet they differ in the rhythmic values – in JC all components of the chord have values of quavers, while the upper e
1 in EF is a crotchet. In PE, we see a simplified notation of the version of analogous bar 10 (the a-c1 third). According to us, it is probably a result of Chopin's negligence, who while writing [A] was already conscious of repeating the text written before (cf. another note in this bar).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
notation: Pitch