data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The dynamic indications visible in EF are a continuation of hairpins in bar 35. According to us, it is highly unlikely that they were authentic in this form, although
dynamics for the returning theme seems to be accurate. In the remaining sources there are no indications in this bar. The appearance of the main thematic thought without indicating the manner of its performance assumes an interpretation which would correspond to the indications given during its previous occurrences (bars 8-9 and 16-17). Taking this into account, we suggest
(in brackets) to be more appropriate than
ending the previous phrase in bar 35.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
notation: Verbal indications