data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
FEF
compare
The slur in PE certainly concerns both voices of the R.H., hence we move it over the stems in order not to suggest a relation to only one of them. After all, it is quite likely that such was the notation of [A], as the engravers routinely moved slurs (and other signs) to the side of note heads.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
notation: Slurs