![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Omission of current key accidentals
b. 95
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
We consider the version with the octave D sharp-d sharp to be the main one, as none of the sources that could be based on the autograph (GC, EE, FE1) has naturals. Still, omission of those accidentals is very probable in that context, so the version of FE2 (D-d) could actually be the one intended by Chopin. To make things clear, we notate the version D sharp-d sharp with cautionary accidentals. Cf. bar 433. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Omission of current key accidentals |
||||||
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
GC has no category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in EE , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of GC |
||||||
b. 272
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE, there is no category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 333
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE there is no category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 433
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
None of the sources seems to be authentic enough. No accidentals before the third octave in GC (→GE1) and FE suggests its reading as D category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |