Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Shorthand & other
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Shorthand & other

b. 33-47

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In GC, bars 33-90 are numbered from 1 to 58. Those numbers are later used for abbreviated marking of bars 375-432, that are the repetition of bars 33-90.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

b. 41-42

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In FE, the upper notes of the octaves (c1 and a) are notated as a separate voice. This is probably the result of misunderstanding the niotation of the base text.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 48-90

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In GC, bars 33-90 are marked with consecutive numbers from 1 to 58. Those numbers are later used for abbreviated marking of bars 375-432, that are the repetition of bars 33-90.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

b. 132-140

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In both bars in EE the fifth a sharp-e1 is not separated fromthe entire chord. This may be either a simplified version of the manuscript or the result of its misunderstanding by the engraver. 

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: EE inaccuracies

b. 154-155

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

 FE and GE have a double bar line between those bars. In the case of GE, this is definitely a revision (in GC, its base text, the bar line is single). This makes us suspect that the version of FE may also result from a routine editorial revision. Chopin used double bar lines infrequently and never treated them as necessarily connected with the change of key. 

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: GE revisions , FE revisions