mUltimate Chopin

Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors in FE

b. 272

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In FE, there is no  raising g1 to g1. This patent inaccuracy could have already been present in the manuscript. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals

b. 275

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In FE, the 5th quaver looks like b, as the note head is lacking its ledger line. The intended text is nonetheless obvious here.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Errors in FE

b. 282-283

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

No all'ottava sign in EE, GC (→GE) & FE2

All'ottava sign continued in FE1
..

In FE1 the octave sign ends as late as bar 283. The error was corrected in FEJ and FES, and also in FE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEJ

b. 299

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

 in EE and GC (→GE)

No marking in FE
..

 is missing from FE, which is probably an accidental omission. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 333

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In FE there is no  augmenting b to b. This is obvious  inaccurracy in Chopin's notation, as when he wrote this bar in [A2] he was convinced that the change of key signatures had already taken place.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals