![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of GC
b. 293
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC, the 3rd quaver of the L.H. sounds as b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC , Alterations in GC |
|||||
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Since there is category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 330
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The initial rhythm in RH ( category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 339
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
There is no bass clef at the end of the bar in EE, GC or FE. Given this consistency of sources we may cpnclude that this error was already present in the two autographs. Since the chords of RH in b. 340 are notated on two staves, lack of the clef does not pose any problems for the text interpetation (in EE and FE b. 340 is printed as the new line of the text with the right clef at the beginning, which minimises the consequences of this omission). The clef was supplemented in GE. We can find similar inaccuracy in b. 347. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Errors of GC |