Issues : Errors in GE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 182
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||||
b. 251-267
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The sources differ with regard to the presence or absence of staccato dots in bars 251, 259 and 267. In our main text we apply the consistent markings of GC. The version of GE is definitely - and that of FE probably - inaccurate. The absence of the dots in EE may be the initial version. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||||
b. 304
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||||
b. 345-347
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
A correct text of LH in these three bars is a result of revisions in FE2 and GE2. An error in b. 345 (repetition of g-f seventh) must have already been present in the autograph, proven by the consistency of EE and GC. In FE1 the correct text of bars 346-347 was printed, by mistake we suppose, in bars 345-346, which resulted in a repetition of g2-f3 seventh in bars 346-347. To keep octaves between dyads in these bars an actave sign was added in b. 347 (Chopin may have done hastily upon correction). In GE1 the seventh in b. 345 was elevated to the right pitch but on the upper note instead of two sharps there is only one printed.
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||||
b. 476-477
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
No tied H in EE seems to have been overlooked. The GC notation is imprecise - at the end of b. 476 (the last one one the page) there is no tie, but it appears in b. 477. However, in GE the tie was not included. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »