Issues : Placement of markings
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 416-431
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The length of an accent used here remains an unsettled issue - short in EE and GC or long in FE (also in subsequent bars - compare bars 418-431). For GE we adopt a short accent just like GC, and the fact that the accent is placed under the RH part must have been the engraver's arbitrary decision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Placement of markings , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 591
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Accents in EE and FE are distictly longer than those of the following bar. In GC (→GE) there is no difference. In the main text we take into account differences in the notation of accents, as it naturally relates to the rhythmic values of notes. In FE accents in bars 591-593 are placed below the staff. This is rather an example of a common engraving manner that placed accents, articulation signs, etc. on the side of the note heads. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Placement of markings |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »