Page: 
Source: 
p. 10, b. 399-446
p. 1, b. 1-47
p. 2, b. 48-98
p. 3, b. 99-158
p. 4, b. 159-198
p. 5, b. 199-238
p. 6, b. 239-270
p. 7, b. 271-306
p. 8, b. 307-347
p. 9, b. 348-398
p. 10, b. 399-446
p. 11, b. 447-484
p. 12, b. 485-528
p. 13, b. 529-565
p. 14, b. 566-604
p. 15, b. 605-649
Main text
Main text
GC - Gutmann's copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 418-431

4 short accents in EE

13 accents in GC (→GE)

12 accents in FE

Our suggestion (13 accents)

Our alternative suggestion (12 accents)

In these bars the question of short or long accents has not beeb resolved. Fortunately enough, a performer who has both options at his disposal is triggered to think about his own idea. The lack of most of the accents in EE must be the engraver's error - the accents end at the beginning a new line of text. The lack of accent in b. 423 in FE is an obvious error too, and we suggest two ways of dealing with it.

See b. 76-89

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents, Errors in EE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins