![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : FE revisions
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 259
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The seventh E category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||||||
b. 297
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE2 the topmost note of the chord was arbitrarily changed from f1 to g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions |
|||||||||||||
b. 337
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE, GC and FE1 there is no category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||||
b. 345-347
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
A correct text of LH in these three bars is a result of revisions in FE2 and GE2. An error in b. 345 (repetition of g
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||||
b. 370-372
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we present the GC undisputable notation. No accent in b. 372 is an obvious omission in EE, and long accents in GE result form not thorough enough analysis of the GC notation (the difference in accents lenghth in bars 360-368 and 370-374 was overlooked). Double accents in FE may have come form a reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , FE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »