Pitch
b. 341-342
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE na GC there is no augmenting a to a in b. 342, which is obvious inaccuracy given in the LH part. In GC there is no appropriate in b. 341. FE and GE are correct. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Errors of GC |
||||
b. 344
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE the crotchet in LH is f-f. The harmonic context of the adjacent bars (335 to 350) suggests erroneously low notation of the bottom note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||
b. 345
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE, GC and FE there is no raising a2 to a2. The accidental was added in GE, which must have been done by the reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||
b. 345-347
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
A correct text of LH in these three bars is a result of revisions in FE2 and GE2. An error in b. 345 (repetition of g-f seventh) must have already been present in the autograph, proven by the consistency of EE and GC. In FE1 the correct text of bars 346-347 was printed, by mistake we suppose, in bars 345-346, which resulted in a repetition of g2-f3 seventh in bars 346-347. To keep octaves between dyads in these bars an actave sign was added in b. 347 (Chopin may have done hastily upon correction). In GE1 the seventh in b. 345 was elevated to the right pitch but on the upper note instead of two sharps there is only one printed.
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||
b. 347
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE and GC there is no bass clef at the end of the bar. Given that both editions are the same, we may suspect Chopin to have made this mistake in [A1]. Since the chords of RH in b. 348 are notated on two staves, lack of the clef does not pose any problems for text interpretation (in EE b. 348 is printed as the new line of the text with the right clef at the beginning, which minimises the consequences of this omission). The clef was supplemented in GE. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Errors of GC |