EE1
compare
In GC the fourth quaver is erroneously notated as e. Out of two theoretically plausible corrections - to e
or f - the second seems more probable based on the corresponding figures in b. 557 and further. All doubts are dispelled by the EE and FE f here. Also in GE the wrong note was corrected to f.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors of GC
notation: Pitch