



b. 34-35
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
GC has category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 34-35
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GE the minim g sharp in bar 35 is sustained with a tie from the previous bar. This is probably a revision resulting from misunderstanding of Chopin's notation, which is confirmed by the omission of an accent above that note. A similar situation occurs when the fragment is repeated in bars 376-377. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The accent visible in GC, if it reproduces the autograph notation faithfully, should be interpreted as a long one. EE has a short accent, which is probably an oversight, while FE and GE have none, which is probably a revision (cf. the note related to bar 377). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 35-36
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Differences between the sources seem to result here from inaccuracy of notation, or even from somewhat imprecise notation of Chopin himself. For that reason we propose a slur modelled after the phrasing in analogous bars 117-118. See also bars 377-381. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
EE has G category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |