Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 106
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The accent under the 1st note of the bar in A should, in our opinion, be considered a long one. In GE it was reproduced as a short accent, which is hardly surprising in this case. In FE (→EE1→EE2) the mark was omitted, probably by accident. It reappeared in EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||||
|
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
There is no numeral 3 over the triplet in A (→GE1→FE). Its absence, although not causing any misunderstanding, is nonetheless a notation error. The numeral was added in EE and GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
We add a cautionary flat before a flat1. The same addition was made in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 127-128
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
A (→GE) has triads as the 2nd and the 3rd crotchets of those bars, although in the first triad in bar 127 the note c1 is practically invisible in the manuscript. When proofing FE, Chopin removed the middle notes of the triads leaving only the sixths. That corrected version was repeated in EE1 (→EE2). EE3 returned to the version of GE1 with the full triads (the omitted note b flat on the 2nd beat of bar 128 must be a mistake). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Uncertain notes on ledger lines |
|||||||
|
b. 127
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The indication written in A as ritenuto was shortened to riten. in GE (→FE→EE). In EE, the abbreviation was placed between the staves. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
