Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The wedge above the crotchet b1, present in A, was omitted from GE1 (→FE→EE). The staccato sign was restored in GE2 (→GE3) in the form of a dot. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 45
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In all the first editions the indication forte was replaced with the symbol category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 54
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
A staccato dot was added in GE2 (→GE3) over the 2nd chord, probably by analogy to bar 51 and also bars 50 and 52. That dot does not appear in A (→GE1→FE→EE), and in our opinion the occurrence of dots, accents and slurs in this fragment is not regular enough to justify potential additions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
A has a single bar line here. Chopin sometimes used double bar lines but did not add them automatically to indicate changes of key, where their significance is mostly conventional. Such a routine addition was made in GE (→FE→EE). A similar situation appears in bar 88. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 57-69
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In bars 57, 61, 65 and 69 the double grace note in GE2 (→GE3) was furnished with a slur linking it to the crotchet. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
. Also, the accent in più is missing in 
