Page: 
Source: 
p. 7, b. 142-161
p. 1, b. 1-24
p. 2, b. 25-49
p. 3, b. 50-75
p. 4, b. 76-103
p. 5, b. 104-124
p. 6, b. 125-141
p. 7, b. 142-161
p. 8, b. 162-182
p. 9, b. 183-207
p. 10, b. 208-228
p. 11, b. 229-248
p. 12, b. 249-269
p. 13, b. 270-292
p. 14, b. 293-312
p. 15, b. 313-332
p. 16, b. 333-352
p. 17, b. 353-373
p. 18, b. 374-399
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 144-145

Accents in A, literal reading

 in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

Long accents in A, contextual interpretation

The three A accents raise doubts as to their position and type of accent. In the first two figures the marks are written under the 3rd R.H. bottom voice quaver, while in the third one – slightly earlier. The first and third ones look like short accents; the second one is slightly longer. According to us, it is highly unlikely that Chopin would have wanted the third quaver to be accented. We do not find a strictly analogous place in the entire IV mov. of the Sonata, yet there is a number of similar situations in which we are dealing with accents – in bars 80-83 and 136-137, there are 7 accents in total, and all concern the first quaver, while 6 of them are long accents. Therefore, we could be dealing with an extreme example of one of the ways of marking long accents – marks entered after a note (cf. I mov., bars 82-84). Taking into account the above, in the main text we suggest long accents in the discussed place.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents, GE revisions, Inaccuracies in A

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: A, EE2, EE1, IE1, GE1, FE1