Page: 
Source: 
p. 16, b. 333-352
p. 1, b. 1-24
p. 2, b. 25-49
p. 3, b. 50-75
p. 4, b. 76-103
p. 5, b. 104-124
p. 6, b. 125-141
p. 7, b. 142-161
p. 8, b. 162-182
p. 9, b. 183-207
p. 10, b. 208-228
p. 11, b. 229-248
p. 12, b. 249-269
p. 13, b. 270-292
p. 14, b. 293-312
p. 15, b. 313-332
p. 16, b. 333-352
p. 17, b. 353-373
p. 18, b. 374-399
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link Main text


  b. 345-350

No marks in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

In the main text we reproduce the dots visible over the e2 crotchet in bar 345 and fin bar 350 as staccato marks. However, this interpretation is uncertain, particularly in bar 350, in which the mark is not in line with the note; actually, it is quite far from it, hence it is likely that it is just one of the accidental ink flecks, which are numerous in A. None of these dots were included in GE (→FE,EE,IE).

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE, Inaccuracies in A

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: A, EE2, EE1, IE1, GE1, FE1