Page: 
Source: 
p. 14, b. 293-312
p. 1, b. 1-24
p. 2, b. 25-49
p. 3, b. 50-75
p. 4, b. 76-103
p. 5, b. 104-124
p. 6, b. 125-141
p. 7, b. 142-161
p. 8, b. 162-182
p. 9, b. 183-207
p. 10, b. 208-228
p. 11, b. 229-248
p. 12, b. 249-269
p. 13, b. 270-292
p. 14, b. 293-312
p. 15, b. 313-332
p. 16, b. 333-352
p. 17, b. 353-373
p. 18, b. 374-399
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 297

Short accent in A (→GEEE,IE)

No mark in FE

Long accent suggested by the editors

In A the accent is shorter than the similar marks in analogous bar 293, 305 and even 309. However, if we take into account the similarity of the rhythmic and harmonic context, this comparison proves that it is also in the discussed bar that Chopin almost certainly meant a long accent.
The missing mark in FE is most probably due to the engraver's oversight.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents, Errors in FE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: A, EE2, EE1, IE1, GE1, FE1