Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 50-75
p. 1, b. 1-24
p. 2, b. 25-49
p. 3, b. 50-75
p. 4, b. 76-103
p. 5, b. 104-124
p. 6, b. 125-141
p. 7, b. 142-161
p. 8, b. 162-182
p. 9, b. 183-207
p. 10, b. 208-228
p. 11, b. 229-248
p. 12, b. 249-269
p. 13, b. 270-292
p. 14, b. 293-312
p. 15, b. 313-332
p. 16, b. 333-352
p. 17, b. 353-373
p. 18, b. 374-399
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 67

 in A (→GEEE,IE)

in FE

Our variant suggestion

The comparison with the pianistically analogous passages in bar 65 and 69 suggests that Chopin could have committed a mistake in positioning the  mark in A. Taking into account this possibility, in the main text we suggest a variant solution in which we put the A mark (being the authentic one) in brackets, while the one added by us by analogy with the adjacent passages – in square brackets.
The FE version is most probably an inaccuracy – the reviser would have moved the mark to the end of the bar. 

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE, Errors of A

notation: Pedalling

Missing markers on sources: A, EE2, EE1, IE1, GE1, FE1