data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Page:
Source:
p. 7, b. 187-221
A - Autograph
Prezentacja
Select
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59ea/e59ea164cc09fb20651e39bd84b5beefb140cf1e" alt=""
The A slur clearly starts from the 2nd quaver, as in analogous bar 10, 12, 193. On the other hand, the ending of the slur breaks off under c1, which is a patent inaccuracy. This explains the action of the engraver of GE (→FE,IE), who "corrected" both ends of the Chopinesque slurs. The later starting point of the slur in EE, accidentally compliant with the A notation, must have resulted from the engraver's inaccuracy or could even be a printing defect.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccurate slurs in A, GE revisions, EE inaccuracies
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
EE2, EE1, IE1, GE1, FE1