



Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 333-334
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
Replacing the wedges with staccato dots was an arbitrary decision by the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||
b. 335
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The missing wedges in the editions are due to mistakes by the engraver of GE, who mistook the wedge over B category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 340
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
We consider the A slur, led to the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in GE , |
||||||||
b. 341
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The wedge was added in GE (→FE,EE,IE), probably by analogy with bar 345. We do not include it in the main text, as the majority of the analogous bars do not contain staccato marks. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 341-346
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the sources the marks in bar 341, 345 and 346 are provided with the form of short accents. However, the comparison with analogous bars reveals that in each of the two sections based on similar motifs (bars 162-171 and 293-312) Chopin most probably meant the same type of accent, which is long accent. In the first fragment there are 5 accents, 3 of which are clearly long, one is short, while one is ambiguous. In the other section out of 4 accents 2 are long, one is short, and one is ambiguous. Due to the above, in the main text we suggest long accents also in the discussed bars. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |