data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In the main text we keep the A version, in which the wedge over the 1st L.H. quaver is written only in bar 12. However, taking into account the similarities between both bars, one can consider the addition introduced by GE (→FE,EE,IE) to be justified, while the version with two wedges an acceptable variant.
The absence of the mark in EE in bar 12 must be a mistake.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in EE, GE revisions
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins