In the sources the 
mark reaches 
, the position of which is, however, ambiguous in A, as it was written over the e
1-e2 L.H. octave and a quaver later as well, under the R.H. e2 note. According to us, the mark is supposed to concern the R.H., and this is the interpretation we provide in the main text. Meanwhile, in the editions was printed on the 4th quaver from the end of the bar, which probably resulted in a respective shift of the hairpin.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in GE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins, Verbal indications
