data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
|
2 slurs, 2nd to f1 in A, literal reading |
|
|
||
|
No slur in EE1 |
|
|
Continuous slur to e |
The division of the slur in A most probably resulted from the care for correct notation, with slurs placed on the side of noteheads, which was considered unnecessary and potentially misleading already in GE (→FE,EE,IE). We include this modification in the main text; moreover, we suggest leading the slur to e1, ending this quaver sequence, since similarly shortened slurs are quite common in A – cf. the L.H. slurs in bar 13 and 15, as well as, e.g. mov. IV, bars 28-30 or 195.
The absence of the slur in EE1 is due to the engraver's mistake, corrected in EE2.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, Errors in EE, Inaccurate slurs in A, GE revisions
notation: Slurs