Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 25-48
p. 1, b. 1-24
p. 2, b. 25-48
p. 3, b. 49-80
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 32

Tied crotchets in sources

Minim suggested by the editors

In the main text we suggest a more legible version of the 2nd and 3rd beat in the R.H. part than the original one. Our suggestion is justified by a situation in mov. IV of the Sonata in which Chopin used two different versions of notation in the same phrase: the first time he wrote down a chord using ties within a bar – cf. bar 57 and 61 – and the second time he switched to a neater version with the use of greater rhythmic values and division into parts.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues:

notation: Rhythm

Missing markers on sources: A, GE1, FE1, EE1, EE2, IE1