Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 25-48
p. 1, b. 1-24
p. 2, b. 25-48
p. 3, b. 49-80
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Revised impression of FE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Revised impression of FE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link Main text


  b. 32

Tied crotchets in sources

Minim suggested by the editors

In the main text we suggest a more legible version of the 2nd and 3rd beat in the R.H. part than the original one. Our suggestion is justified by a situation in mov. IV of the Sonata in which Chopin used two different versions of notation in the same phrase: the first time he wrote down a chord using ties within a bar – cf. bar 57 and 61 – and the second time he switched to a neater version with the use of greater rhythmic values and division into parts.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues:

notation: Rhythm

Missing markers on sources: A, GE1, FE1, EE1, EE2, IE1, FE2