data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Page:
Source:
p. 3, b. 49-80
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59ea/e59ea164cc09fb20651e39bd84b5beefb140cf1e" alt=""
When interpreted literally, the A slur must be inaccurate – unfinished – as many other slurs in this manuscripts (cf., e.g. mov. I, bars 182-183 or mov. IV, bars 350-351). At the same time, it does not matter whether we regard it as reaching d or c
. Therefore, one can understand why the GE engraver did not include this slur (unless it was a mere oversight). In the main text we suggest a slur modelled after analogous bars 73-74.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: Inaccurate slurs in A, Errors in GE
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
A, GE1, FE1, EE1, EE2, IE1