data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
|
Wedges & staccato dots in A, literal reading |
|
|
||
|
Staccato dots suggested by the editors |
The staccato marks over the R.H. chords are rather wedges in A, and this is how they were interpreted in GE (→FE,EE,IE). By contrast, the marks in the L.H. part must be dots, hence reproducing them as wedges seems wrong. According to us, the change of dynamics corresponds with milder articulation, hence it is more likely that the chords were marked inaccurately. Therefore, we consider the literal interpretation of A and the solution suggested in the main text to be potentially authentic.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: Wedges, Inaccuracies in A
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins