Page: 
Source: 
p. 9, b. 163-183
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-42
p. 3, b. 43-62
p. 4, b. 63-81
p. 5, b. 82-103
p. 6, b. 104-124
p. 7, b. 125-142
p. 8, b. 143-162
p. 9, b. 163-183
p. 10, b. 184-206
p. 11, b. 207-227
p. 12, b. 228-248
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 179

Slur from 2nd quaver in A (→GEEE,IE)

Slur from first quaver in FE

The A slur is clearly visible only from the 4th quaver; however, traces of pen are visible from the 2nd quaver. This is how it was reproduced by GE (→EE,IE). According to us, the later starting point of this slur than the one suggested by the phrase structure is an inaccuracy, probably caused by lack of space – a slur starting from the 1st quaver would intersect the natural, which could hamper the interpretation of this fragment. Due to the above, in the main text we begin the slur from the 1st quaver, as in bar 1 and as it was interpreted by FE.
See also bars 181 and 182-183.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A, FE revisions

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: A, GE1, FE1, IE1, EE1, EE2