data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 164-165
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In A (→GE→FE,EE) the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Cautionary accidentals , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE , |
|||||
b. 164-165
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The missing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 165
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In GE (→FE,EE,IE) the slur and the dots were most probably added by analogy with the preceding bar, although it would be more reasonable to follow bar 163. Anyway, the indicated articulation most probably corresponds to the one intended by Chopin, hence this version can be considered an acceptable variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 166-171
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we do not include the inauthentic R.H. part fingering added by EE in bar 166, 168 and 170-171. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 166
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
Chopin wrote a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |