data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
It is unclear how to interpret the mark written in A over the R.H. part, as it is accompanied by a
mark under the stave, of almost identical range. Therefore, the top mark must refer to the top voice only and – when interpreted literally – would require the f
2 quaver to be performed softer while realising the crescendo in the bottom voice. According to us, it is highly unlikely that Chopin would have envisioned such a fancy interpretation of this bar, hence in the main text we interpret the top mark as a long accent over f2, which results in a completely natural combination of an accent and a crescendo. The accenting nature of this mark can also be indicated by its beginning, which is slightly before the note.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Editorial revisions
issues: Long accents
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins