data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The way the 3rd quaver in the bar was written down in A is unclear – one can see a protrusion before the c3 minim, resembling a quaver notehead at the same pitch, while the presence of an a
2 quaver is unobvious, since the protrusion of the stem indicating the presence of a notehead is imperceptible. Consequently, in GE (→FE,EE,IE) both voices coincide on c
3, while a
2 is totally absent. In the main text we provide a different interpretation of the A notation – we consider the c
3 quaver a remaining element of the initial version (or erroneous) of notation without the note having been prolonged, while in the bottom voice we put a
2, which – as resulting in a more natural melodic sequence in this voice – is, according to us, written here.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Errors resulting from corrections, Inaccuracies in A
notation: Pitch