data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In A the shape of the slur between the e3 crotchet and the e
2 quaver resembles the shape of a tie, which suggests that Chopin wrote it by mistake, believing that he was combining two identical notes. Such a tie would make sense in a similar figure 2 bars earlier (bar 59), yet it is uncertain whether it was indeed Chopin's intention (in the analogous phrase in the recapitulation a similar tie is absent both in bar 219 and 221). A trill starting from a tied note is generally rare; in the case of Chopin's oeuvre, it is unheard of, hence we do not suggest such an interpretation of the composer's intention, not even as a variant. In the discussed place it can be considered a slur; however, due to the fact that it is most likely a mistake, we omit it in the main text, as it was already done in GE (→FE,EE,IE).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: GE revisions, Errors of A
notation: Slurs