data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In A (→GE→EE1,IE) there is no accidental to the bottom note of the 1st third in the 2nd half of the bar, which results in e2. What is more, 2 quavers later we see a
to e2, which seems to confirm e
2 in this place. Nevertheless, the L.H. chord featuring e1 as the topmost note, played simultaneously, points to Chopin's patent mistake. It was noticed and corrected only in FE and EE2. Incidentally, a similar situation in A in analogous bar 126 was corrected already in GE.
In the main text we add a necessary to the 5th quaver and omit the accidental to the 7th quaver, which is no longer necessary in this context.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Omission of current key accidentals, Errors of A, FE revisions, Errors repeated in GE, Errors repeated in EE
notation: Pitch