data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
When interpreted literally, in EE the semibreve at the beginning of the bar is a c1. It is a mistake by the engraver, who wrote a ledger line across a note put at the right pitch. In the content transcription we consider this note to be a c1, as it seems that due to the c
1 crotchet, which directly precedes it, this is how this notation was most probably interpreted. In the main text we provide the unquestionable version of the remaining sources, which is b
.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Errors in EE, Errors repeated in EE
notation: Pitch