Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 21-42
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 2, b. 21-42
p. 3, b. 43-60
p. 4, b. 61-75
p. 5, b. 76-90
p. 6, b. 91-105
p. 7, b. 106-126
p. 8, b. 127-147
p. 9, b. 148-163
p. 10, b. 164-178
p. 11, b. 179-198
p. 12, b. 199-224
p. 13, b. 225-240
p. 14, b. 241-255
p. 15, b. 256-271
p. 16, b. 272-293
p. 17, b. 294-315
p. 18, b. 316-332
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 41

No marking in A (→GE)

in FE (→EE)

(), our variant suggestion

The  indication was almost certainly added by Chopin to [FC] or in the process of proofreading FE1, hence we include it in the main text. The brackets result from uncertainty as to the relationship of this indication with  in bar 43, as no other source features both. Chopin could have been aware of the absence of  (or even removed it) and added  instead. In this case, these indications should be considered separately, taking into account only one of them. On the other hand, he could have added  simply to specify the dynamics in this place, regardless of the other markings or their absence, which would allow us to take into consideration both indications. Out of these three possibilities –  only,  only, both – the variant solution we adopted includes the ones with the indication written in the principal source (A).

See b. 43

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Verbal indications

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FE2, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2