Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 2, b. 21-42
p. 3, b. 43-60
p. 4, b. 61-75
p. 5, b. 76-90
p. 6, b. 91-105
p. 7, b. 106-126
p. 8, b. 127-147
p. 9, b. 148-163
p. 10, b. 164-178
p. 11, b. 179-198
p. 12, b. 199-224
p. 13, b. 225-240
p. 14, b. 241-255
p. 15, b. 256-271
p. 16, b. 272-293
p. 17, b. 294-315
p. 18, b. 316-332
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 1-16

No L.H. markings in A & FE (→EE1)

L.H. dots & slurs in GE1

L.H. slurs & dots in EE2

L.H. slurs & dots in GE2

In bars 1-2, 5-7, 11-12 and 15-16, in GE and in EE2 (probably on the basis thereof) separate articulation markings for the L.H. were added (staccato dots and slurs under the stave). In bars 1-2 in EE2 only slurs were added, since this edition does not contain dots in the R.H. part. In these two bars it is also GE2 that contains slurs only, since the dots at the beginning of the piece were replaced with a slur, also in the R.H. These additions cannot be authentic; moreover, they are superfluous, since Chopin would very often omit markings for a left-hand part led in unison, considering them obvious (although he was not always consistent – there are examples of both parallel parts being provided with markings – one should not assume that the lack of markings could suggest the use of a different kind of articulation).

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions, GE revisions

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FE2, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2