Slurs
|
b. 78-79
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we give the A (→GE) version. The continuous FE slur could be considered – as in the entire theme – an equal variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 79-80
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we give the divided A (→GE) slurs. The continuous FE (→EE) slur may be considered an equal variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 80-81
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A the slur at the end of bar 80, which ends a page, suggests that it should be continued, which is not confirmed by the beginning of the slur in bar 81. In GE there is a continuous slur; however, according to us, the interpretation of the A notation – via [FC] – visible in FE would be better, and we give it in the main text. In EE the notation was considered an inaccuracy, and the slurs were divided. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 81-82
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we consistently give the shorter A (→GE) slurs. The continuous FE (→EE) slur may be considered an equal variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 82
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A the slur over the final triplet was placed inaccurately – its beginning is closer to the preceding semiquaver, while its ending reaches the next bar. According to us, both ends were written with a flourish, and the slur is to be interpreted as a slur encompassing the triplet only, as in analogous bar 78. However, in GE it also encompasses the semiquaver. The continuous FE (→EE) slur, which could have resulted from Chopin's corrections to [FC], can be considered an equal variant. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
