data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||
b. 57-58
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The missing tie to g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors of A |
|||||
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The comparison with analogous bars – see the note on bar 43 – points to a possible mistake by Chopin, as far as the placement of the slur's beginning is concerned. Due to this, in the main text we suggest a slur whose range corresponds to the slurs' range in the analogous bars. See also the note on bars 57-58. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In FE1 the ties to B category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The missing fingering in EE1 is most probably an oversight by the engraver of this edition. The mistake was corrected in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |