Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 321

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

in A

in GE & FE (→EE)

..

The range of the  mark in A may give rise to doubts, since its arms are of different length. The engravers took into account the bottom, longer arm and assumed that the mark reaches the last small crotchet. It does not seem to be an accurate interpretation of Chopin's intention, since such long crescendo cannot be simultaneously combined with smorz. - -. The editors of mUltimate Chopin assume the top arm of the mark to be reliable, written first, and this is how they reproduce this hairpin both in the transcription of A and in the main text.
(Minor inaccuracies in the reproduction of the A hairpins by the editions are also to be seen in the case of the previous marks in this bar.)

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Inaccuracies in A