data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The augmentation dot to F was overlooked in the editions due to the then convention of putting such dots in a place in which the tied note represented by the dot would be, in this case under g
in the tenor voice. Chopin would use this convention rather as an exception (e.g. in the middle voices in bars 30-31 and 34-35 in the Etude in E, Op. 10 No. 3); therefore, it is not surprising that this dot, so far away from the note, was overlooked.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE, Errors in GE
notation: Rhythm