data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
It is only FE and EE2 that include all slurs linking the grace note with the 1st quaver in bars 85-86 and 89 (the slur in bar 90 is present in all sources). It most probably resulted from Chopin's additions to [FC] or at the stage of proofreading FE1, while in the case of EE2 it was a correction of the oversight in EE1. The versions with a smaller number of slurs resulted from Chopin's inaccuracies in A and from oversights in EE1 and GE.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in EE, Errors in GE, Authentic corrections of FE
notation: Slurs