data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The missing accidental to the 12th semiquaver formally means that it is a G1. However, in similar contexts, Chopin would often consider the accidentals to the same note in a different octave in a given bar to still be valid. Taking into account the 4th semiquaver, G, the discussed note should rather be deemed G
1. The revisers of GE and EE1 differed on this issue; the change introduced by EE2 could have been inspired by the GE1 text.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, Accidentals in different octaves, GE revisions, Inaccuracies in A
notation: Pitch